Extended Release
Matrix Tablets of Nateglinide: Formulation and In vitro Evaluation
Dr. Y. Krishna Reddy*, K.
Akhila
Department of Indutrial
Pharmacy, Nalanda College of Pharmacy, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological
University, Hyderabad, Telangana.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: rajinisuralabs1@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
In the present study to
establish oral extended release tablets of Nateglinide using different
polymers. The tablets were prepared using Xanthan gum, HPMC K15, Carbapol 934
using different polymers to impart extended release study. Tablets were
evaluated by different parameters such as weight variation, content uniformity,
thickness, hardness, IR spectral analysis, in vitro release studies and
kinetic analysis of dissolution data. The present study concluded that extended
release tablets of Nateglinde can be a good way to increases the dissolution
and bioavailability of Nateglinde.
KEYWORDS: Nateglinde,
Extended release tablets.
INTRODUCTION:
Oral drug delivery is the
largest and oldest segment of the total drug delivery market. It is the fastest
growing and most preferred route for drug administration. Use of hydrophilic
matrices for oral extended release of drugs is common practice in the
pharmaceutical industry. However, also drugs with long half-life qualify if a
reduction in steady state fluctuation is desired.
With many drugs, the basic
goal of therapy is to achieve a steady-state blood level or tissue level that
is therapeutically effective and non toxic for an extended period of time. To
achieve better therapeutic action various types of drug delivery systems are available,
out of which extended release systems are gaining much importance because of
their wide advantages over others like ease of administration, convenience and
non-invasiveness1.
Nateglinide is highly tissue
selective with low affinity for heart and skeletal muscle. The drug is widely
used for the management of type-2 diabetes. It has short biological half life
(1.5 ± 0.7 h) and bioavailability is 73%. Moreover, site of absorption of
Nateglinide is in the intestine. The common goal for increased duration is
twice a day, or when feasible, once a day. Several properties of the drug
itself can lead to the achievement of a 12 to 24 hours oral prolonged release
dosage form. Some of the characteristics militating against success are very
short half life or a relatively large single dose; potent drug with a low
margin safety; poorly soluble drug, large first pass metabolism. The short
biological half life of the drug favors the development of extended release
formulation2-8.
MATERIALS:
Nateglinide gift sample
provided by Sura Labs, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad. Xanthan gum, HPMC K15, Carbapol
934, PVP K30, Talc, Magnesium Stearate, MCCpH102 purchased from Merck
Specialities Pvt Ltd, Mumbai, India.
Formulation development of Tablets:
All the formulations were prepared by direct
compression.
Table
No:1 Formulation composition for tablets
Ingrediants |
F1 |
F2 |
F3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
F10 |
F11 |
F12 |
Nateglinide |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
Xanthan gum |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
HPMC K15 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Carbapol 934 |
- |
- |
- |
-- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
20 |
40 |
60 |
80 |
PVP K30 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
Talc |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Magnesium Stearate |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
MCC pH 102 |
109 |
89 |
69 |
49 |
109 |
89 |
69 |
49 |
109 |
89 |
69 |
49 |
Total weight |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
All the quantities were in mg
METHODS:
Preformulation parameters
It was evaluated for Bulk density, True density, Angle of repose,
Compressibility index, Hausner ratio.
Evaluation of post compression parameters for prepared Tablets:
The designed formulation tablets were studied for their physicochemical
properties like weight variation, hardness, thickness, friability and drug
content.
In vitro drug release studies:
Dissolution
parameters:
Apparatus --USP-II, Paddle
Method
Dissolution Medium-- 0.1 N
HCl, pH 6.8 Phosphate buffer
RPM-- 50
Sampling intervals
(hrs)--
0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
10, 11, 12
Temperature---37°C ± 0.5°C
Application of Release Rate Kinetics to Dissolution Data:
To analyze the mechanism of the drug release rate kinetics of the dosage
form, the obtained data were fitted into zero-order, first order, Higuchi, and
Korsmeyer-Peppas release model.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
Preformulation parameters of powder blend
Table
No:2 Pre-formulation parameters of Core blend
Formulation Code |
Angle of Repose |
Bulk density (gm/ml) |
Tapped density (gm/ml) |
Carr’s index (%) |
Hausner’s Ratio |
F1 |
25.0 |
0.719 |
0.789 |
22.2 |
1.28 |
F2 |
21.0 |
0.658 |
0.726 |
15.4 |
1.08 |
F3 |
20.0 |
0.621 |
0.776 |
9.92 |
1.11 |
F4 |
23.0 |
0.624 |
0.712 |
12.78 |
1.14 |
F5 |
22.0 |
0.677 |
0.722 |
9.14 |
1.10 |
F6 |
21.0 |
0.656 |
0.778 |
12.98 |
1.14 |
F7 |
23.0 |
0.621 |
0.723 |
13.69 |
1.15 |
F8 |
22.0 |
0.699 |
0.744 |
16.53 |
1.19 |
F9 |
20.0 |
0.668 |
0.734 |
10.34 |
1.11 |
F10 |
25.0 |
0.614 |
0.854 |
15.80 |
1.18 |
F11 |
21.0 |
0.658 |
0.726 |
15.4 |
1.08 |
F12 |
25.0 |
0.719 |
0.789 |
22.2 |
1.28 |
Quality Control Parameters For tablets:
Table
No:3 In vitro quality control parameters for tablets
Formulation codes |
Average Weight (mg) |
Hardness(kg/cm2) |
Friability (%loss) |
Thickness (mm) |
Drug content (%) |
F1 |
199 |
3.57 |
0.29 |
2.29 |
99 |
F2 |
200 |
3.27 |
0.21 |
2.22 |
100 |
F3 |
198 |
3.33 |
0.36 |
2.46 |
98 |
F4 |
198 |
3.45 |
0.49 |
2.38 |
99 |
F5 |
197 |
3.49 |
0.35 |
2.76 |
98 |
F6 |
200 |
3.38 |
0.47 |
2.43 |
97 |
F7 |
199 |
3.42 |
0.54 |
2.37 |
99 |
F8 |
198 |
3.55 |
0.28 |
2.35 |
98 |
F9 |
195 |
3.62 |
0.36 |
2.28 |
99 |
F10 |
196 |
3.46 |
0.55 |
2.45 |
97 |
F11 |
199 |
3.38 |
0.44 |
2.54 |
97 |
F12 |
197 |
3.31 |
0.53 |
2.39 |
98 |
In Vitro Drug Release Studies
Table No:4 Dissolution Data of
Nateglinide Tablets
TIME (HRS) |
CUMULATIVE percent drug RELEASED |
||||||||||||
f1 |
f2 |
f3 |
F4 |
F5 |
F6 |
F7 |
F8 |
F9 |
F10 |
F11 |
F12 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0.5 |
18.25 |
12.47 |
8.52 |
5.14 |
24.51 |
17.14 |
13.12 |
9.56 |
39.62 |
26.37 |
22.34 |
19.54 |
|
1 |
27.55 |
19.56 |
12.14 |
11.62 |
31.53 |
23.27 |
18.56 |
12.62 |
55.61 |
37.36 |
32.54 |
25.51 |
|
2 |
48.44 |
28.78 |
18.02 |
16.14 |
39.64 |
32.66 |
23.34 |
19.42 |
73.01 |
46.08 |
41.08 |
31.65 |
|
3 |
68.62 |
34.43 |
24.61 |
21.41 |
46.16 |
41.84 |
26.85 |
25.83 |
89.62 |
59.52 |
46.52 |
42.47 |
|
4 |
73.75 |
41.54 |
29.41 |
25.15 |
61.31 |
54.64 |
33.87 |
29.35 |
98.11 |
66.33 |
59.42 |
46.26 |
|
5 |
81.63 |
49.16 |
35.47 |
31.56 |
76.64 |
61.54 |
41.53 |
35.88 |
|
76.14 |
67.57 |
52.33 |
|
6 |
97.87 |
57.56 |
42.11 |
36.58 |
88.64 |
67.64 |
49.22 |
41.54 |
|
85.48 |
72.43 |
61.51 |
|
7 |
|
61.73 |
48.78 |
43.16 |
98.54 |
72.85 |
57.94 |
51.72 |
|
98.23 |
76.25 |
68.84 |
|
8 |
|
70.59 |
54.51 |
51.51 |
|
88.23 |
66.73 |
57.65 |
|
|
88.19 |
77.54 |
|
9 |
|
78.48 |
59.92 |
57.64 |
|
98.54 |
75.53 |
65.62 |
|
|
98.25 |
84.46 |
|
10 |
|
84.25 |
66.14 |
62.20 |
|
|
86.93 |
73.56 |
|
|
|
98.14 |
|
11 |
|
90.56 |
74.64 |
69.51 |
|
|
91.58 |
82.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
99.57 |
81.51 |
76.51 |
|
|
97.27 |
89.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fig No:1 Dissolution profile of
Nateglinide (F1-F12 formulations)
Formulations
prepared with Xanthan gum retarded the drug release in the concentration of 40
mg (F2 Formulation) showed required release pattern i.e., retarded the drug
release up to 12 hours and showed maximum of 99.57% in 12 hours with good
retardation. From the dissolution data it was evident that the formulations
prepared with HPMC K15 as polymer were retard the drug release up to desired
time period i.e., 12 hours. The formulations prepared with Carbapol 934 were
unable to retard up to 12 hours. Hence they were not considered.
Application of Release Rate Kinetics to Dissolution Data:
Table No:5 Release
kinetics data for optimised formulation
Cumulative (%) Release Q |
Time (T) |
Root (T) |
Log (%) Release |
Log (T) |
Log (%) Remain |
Release Rate (Cumulative % Release / t) |
1/Cum% Release |
Peppas log Q/100 |
% Drug Remaining |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2.000 |
|
|
|
100 |
12.47 |
0.5 |
0.707 |
1.096 |
-0.301 |
1.942 |
24.940 |
0.0802 |
-0.904 |
87.53 |
19.56 |
1 |
1.000 |
1.291 |
0.000 |
1.905 |
19.560 |
0.0511 |
-0.709 |
80.44 |
28.78 |
2 |
1.414 |
1.459 |
0.301 |
1.853 |
14.390 |
0.0347 |
-0.541 |
71.22 |
34.43 |
3 |
1.732 |
1.537 |
0.477 |
1.817 |
11.477 |
0.0290 |
-0.463 |
65.57 |
41.54 |
4 |
2.000 |
1.618 |
0.602 |
1.767 |
10.385 |
0.0241 |
-0.382 |
58.46 |
49.16 |
5 |
2.236 |
1.692 |
0.699 |
1.706 |
9.832 |
0.0203 |
-0.308 |
50.84 |
57.56 |
6 |
2.449 |
1.760 |
0.778 |
1.628 |
9.593 |
0.0174 |
-0.240 |
42.44 |
61.73 |
7 |
2.646 |
1.790 |
0.845 |
1.583 |
8.819 |
0.0162 |
-0.210 |
38.27 |
70.59 |
8 |
2.828 |
1.849 |
0.903 |
1.468 |
8.824 |
0.0142 |
-0.151 |
29.41 |
78.48 |
9 |
3.000 |
1.895 |
0.954 |
1.333 |
8.720 |
0.0127 |
-0.105 |
21.52 |
84.25 |
10 |
3.162 |
1.926 |
1.000 |
1.197 |
8.425 |
0.0119 |
-0.074 |
15.75 |
90.56 |
11 |
3.317 |
1.957 |
1.041 |
0.975 |
8.233 |
0.0110 |
-0.043 |
9.44 |
99.57 |
12 |
3.464 |
1.998 |
1.079 |
-0.367 |
8.298 |
0.0100 |
-0.002 |
0.43 |
Fig
No:2 Zero order release kinetics graph
Fig
No:3 Higuchi release kinetics graph
Fig
No:4 Kars mayer peppas graph
Fig No:5 First order
release kinetics graph
From the above
graphs it was evident that the formulation F2 was followed Kors mayer peppas
kinetics.
АCKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Thе authors arе
thankful to Sura Labs, Dilshukhnagar, Hydеrabad for providing thе
nеcеssary facilitiеs, Materials for thе
rеsеarch work.
REFERENCES:
1.
Bhansali,
S R Massodi, Efficiency of Once or Twice- daily Extended Release Metformin
Compared with Trice-daily Immediate Release Metformin in Type 2 Dibetes
Mellitus, J.A.P.I, Vol.53 May 2005, 441-445.
2.
www.drugbank.ca/drugs
3.
wikipedia.org/wiki/Nateglinide
4.
Milo
Gibaldi, Donald Pferzier. Pharmacokinetics Edn 2, Vol.15 revised and expanded
pp.185.
5.
Mr.
Samir J. Shah, Dr. Paresh B. Shah Dr. Mukesh S. Patel, Dr. Mukesh R. Patel. A
review on extended release drug delivery system and multiparticulate system.
Vol 4, Issue 08, 2015.
6.
Wani
MS. Controlled Release System A Review; Pharmaceutical Reviews., 2008; 6(1):
41-46.
7.
Brahmankar
H A, Jaiswal S B. Bio pharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics. Treatise: Vallabh
Prakashan; 2000.
8.
Priya V
Bhosale, Arati N Ranade, Chandrakant Awahad. Formulation and Evaluation of
Extended Release Tablet of Ranolazine. July - September 2015.
Received on 26.02.2020
Modified on 28.03.2020
Accepted on 18.04.2020 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2020; 10(2):101-104.
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5691.2020.00019.2